Focused decision

Architecture Decision Sprint

Resolve the architecture question blocking progress.

Bring evidence, alternatives, the decision-makers and the teams affected together around one defined software or AI architecture decision.

Need a written review of one design, vendor proposal or significant technical direction? See Architecture Peer Review.

What you receive

The result of this engagement.

  1. A structured option and risk comparison.
  2. A report with recommendation and rationale.
  3. A prioritised next-action summary and a readout for the decision-makers.

When this helps

Recognise the situation.

  • A build/buy, platform or architecture choice is blocking a concrete commitment.
  • Decision-makers and teams have competing preferences but no shared decision criteria.
  • A focused workshop and evidence review can resolve the question without a wider assessment.

How it works

Evidence appropriate to the question.

Frame the decision

Agree alternatives, constraints, decision rights and the evidence needed.

Test the options

Review the material and challenge trade-offs with the decision-makers.

Record the recommendation

Explain the preferred path, assumptions, rejected options and immediate next actions.

Scope & responsibility

Agree the scope and depth. Keep the boundaries clear.

Scope of the engagement

This is a focused architecture decision engagement. Wider business strategy, investment planning and whole-system diagnosis are not implied.

Limits of reliance

A time-limited decision engagement relies on sufficient evidence and the availability of the decision-makers. Unresolved evidence needs may require a different scope.

Who does what. A named senior architect leads the work and owns the integrated recommendation. Specialists in security, data, platforms, integration or AI governance join where agreed. Your teams and partners build and run the system. You keep the final business and acceptance decisions.

The agreed scope of the engagement sets the coverage, deliverables, responsibilities, timing and fixed fee. Any change to the scope is agreed in writing.

Questions

Before you book.

How do we choose this or Peer Review?

Peer Review is useful when there is a design or position to challenge. A decision sprint puts more emphasis on framing and comparing alternatives with the decision-makers. We scope the appropriate format together.

What's the decision in front of you?

Tell us the situation and what you intend to commit to. 25 minutes on Teams, no preparation needed. If this scope is not the right fit, we will say so.

Book a 25-minute call